The expression identifies methods individuals might consider when attempting to gain an unfair advantage during a supervised assessment designed to ensure academic integrity. Examples could involve using unauthorized materials, seeking external assistance, or circumventing security measures put in place by the proctoring system. Such actions undermine the validity of the examination process.
Understanding the motivations and strategies associated with such behavior is crucial for institutions aiming to develop more effective preventative measures. Examining past instances and analyzing the technological advancements that facilitate such activities helps in refining proctoring protocols and reinforcing ethical academic conduct. This historical context sheds light on the evolving challenges faced by educators.
